Clarifying the Misuse of “Christian Nationalism”
The term “Christian nationalism” is increasingly misused. In many cases, it functions less as a definition and more as a label used to discredit or silence Christians who engage in public debate.
1. “Christians are becoming political.”
This reverses reality. Christianity isn’t becoming more political — politics is becoming more moralized and ideological. Modern movements increasingly demand moral conformity and treat dissent as heresy. When Christians speak from long-held moral convictions, they are accused of politicizing faith, when in reality they are responding to a politicized culture.
2. “Separation of church & state means Christians should stay out of politics.”
This is false. Separation of church and state means:
• The government does not control the church
• The church does not govern the state
It does not mean religious citizens lose their right to speak, vote, or advocate in public life. That interpretation is a modern distortion, not a constitutional principle.
3. “Acknowledging Canada’s Christian roots violates secular government.”
Canada is secular by law, not by origin. Recognizing Christian foundations is historical fact, not a call for theocracy.
Examples include:
• British common law shaped by Judeo-Christian moral assumptions
• Christmas and Easter as federal holidays
• The national anthem referencing God
• Oaths of office historically sworn on the Bible
• The Charter of Rights and Freedoms referencing “the supremacy of God and the rule of law”
Secular governance prevents state-imposed religion — it does not require erasing the cultural and moral history that shaped the nation.